gm Hydratooooors,

We are currently in the process of withdrawing our Wormhole (Acala) assets and swapping them for Wormhole (Moonbeam) [MRL] assets as per [this discussion](https://hydradx.subsquare.io/posts/102).

We are also **imminently going to be launching our Stablepools feature** (finally!), meaning that when our DAI > USDC OTC order is filled, we will be launching USDC (native) directly into a Stablepool with USDT (native). We currently have between 2-2.1M DAI allocated as Omnipool liquidity.

In order to reduce our "bridge risk", we should not include DAI in a Stablepool with our native assets - that being said, we *do* need to have means of low slippage swaps between bridged and native stablecoins. **I believe we can leverage MRL, Stablepools & Omnipool to provide a low-slippage decentralised stablecoins onboarding route into our ecosystem.**

----

My proposal is as follows:

- **Diversify some of the ~2M DAI** allocated as Omnipool liquidity (currently split between Acala & Moonbeam wormhole assets) into:
    - 300K DAI (MRL)
    - 300K USDC (MRL)
    - 300K USDT (MRL)
    - 300K USDC (or T) (native)
- Place those assets into a **4pool** Stablepool
- Deposit the 4pool asset shares into the Omnipool

This will compliment our other **2pool** Stablepool - USDC/ USDT (native) - which will also have its' asset shares deposited into the Omnipool. (liquidity will likely be ~2.6M worth of each, 2.2M current allocation + 800K of the existing DAI allocation)

The combination of these two Stablepools, deposited into the Omnipool will:
- Allow HydraDX to operate as an onboarding route for DAI/USDT/USDC liquidity from Ethereum to Polkadot native stablecoins, with minimal price impact
- Maintain stablecoin liquidity in the Omnipool at the current agreed ~6.6M across DAI/USDT/USDC
- Reduce reliance on bridged versions of stablecoins and limit the impact of any risk on our protocol owned native stablecoins
- Improve efficiency of swaps involving stablecoins

----

I have raised this discussion now, as we are currently in the process of swapping DAI (Acala Wormhole) for MRL versions - however, it would make sense to OTC the DAI directly into USDT (MRL)/ USDC (MRL)/USDC (native) instead of swapping to DAI (MRL) and then swapping once more for each of those assets.

Happy to answer any questions - **stay hydrated**!

----

**EDIT:** I have updated the numbers to ~300K of each of the assets in the MRL 4pool, as the research work we've done on the A parameters suggests that this will provide ample liquidity for the onboarding of liquidity. The remaining DAI from this allocation will be redirected towards native stablecoins.

#106 Diversification of MRL DAI